Showing posts with label Petition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Petition. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Starving the Artists

Like most alumni of SUNY Albany, I was shocked to hear last week that, effective 2012, Albany will be cutting its theatre major from the curriculum.

Not just theatre, but classics, French, Russian, and Italian will be cut from the school budget.  Students currently majoring will be allowed to finish their degrees, but beyond that there will be no new enrollments accepted.  Almost immediately after the news broke, this petition was started to overturn the school's decision and save the cut language departments.  It is closing in on 10,000 signatures.  If you too feel that the board of SUNY Albany is being unjust and making a decision detrimental to the University, I encourage you to sign it as well.

I have not.  Not yet, anyway.

Of course I believe in the cause of preventing SUNY Albany from cutting classes that make it a more diverse, versatile school.  Albany's Theatre Department is where I earned my degree, and it is an unsettling feeling to think that after my graduation, there was only one more class of incoming Freshmen who will sit like I did in the Performing Arts Center - PAC -  lounge, portrait of Agnes Futterer (who must be turning in her grave) looking down on them.  If I were to go visit after 2012 I would probably find that business or science had moved in to the PAC halls.  Instead of the Theatre Council meeting to discuss the next comedy and improv show, students will probably be discussing nanotechnology, Albany's real focus.  This is not to denigrate the work in science being done at Albany at all.  That's not the point - it's what I know they're giving up in order to make it happen.

No more listening to students talking about Strindberg or Ibsen.  No more comparing notes on shows from the past and how much working on them sucked but we'd totally do it all over again.  No more hanging out by the windows watching people as they enter or leave.  No more crowding around the tiny hall by the elevators after the newest cast list is posted.  No more PAC Rats, the Albany Theatre softball team.  No more student productions, no more backstage drama, no more long hours in the shop, no more anything that I remember from college.  It's like a part of my past is just being erased.

And that is sad, and it is frustrating to me that when schools look for budget cuts the arts and humanities are always the first to go.  Society needs art, it needs theater, in order to define itself; to create context for future generations.  Books, movies, poems, music; all of these do the same, but a play combines all of those art forms and challenges an audience to really think about the things they're seeing and feeling.  A play can be mindless entertainment, or it can confront societal issues, seek answers to larger - and smaller - questions about life, and do so with the kind of subtly and nuance missing from most other forms of social media.  Theatre, and art in general, set us apart from other primates.  "All the world's a stage," said Shakespeare, and I believe that.  When we tear a stage down we lose another part of the world.  I hate it every single time I see an arts program losing funding or shutting down.  Now it's happening at the University I graduated from.

So yes, of course I believe in the cause, I just don't know if I agree with the protest itself.

Contrary to what you might think, petitioning your government is an excellent way to get things done.  Congressmen and women do care about keeping the voters happy, and it's always a feather in the cap of an administrator when they can say they saved a program that would have died without them.  Furthermore, budgets change every year.  Albany is suffering a combined deficit over the last few years of $44 million, which led to these program cuts.  It could very well happen that next year New York State might release more funds into the education budget, and if protests were loud enough, they will probably use it to save the department - at least for a few more years. 

The reason I haven't signed the petition yet is that I just want to believe we can do more.

Signing online petitions, complaining about things over the internet, creating a Facebook page detailing how much you detest a certain act; these all seem to have become more common than actual protest.  Just one click and you can feel good about yourself.  It's very convenient, and then you don't have to do anything else.  That's your contribution, thanks for stopping by.

I don't buy it.  I don't want to feel a false sense of gratification that I helped change something because I clicked a link and wrote my name.  My first reaction was to send a letter to the University President asking how much money would have to be raised, and in what amount of time, to preserve the Theatre Department  (he actually wrote back a short time later, telling me someone in his office would send a financial report my way).  A few people on the Facebook page (I told you) have even gone so far as to say it is the job of our generation to take charge and make sure languages, classics, and theatre are preserved.  I wholeheartedly agree, just as much as I disagree with using this method to go about it.  I want to save the programs being cut, but maybe the answer isn't in petitioning the government.  Maybe it's in raising the money ourselves to donate to the school.  Since the current management has proven that even after tuition hikes, past budget cuts, and staff layoffs, they still can't keep the University from losing money, maybe it's time for members of my generation to take over those positions and prove they can do a better job.

The petition closes on October 18th, and I still don't know if my name is going to be on it.  If I sign it, will I feel like I've done something?  It sure doesn't seem like it's doing anything, but like I said, who knows?  People do pay attention to things like this.  I just don't know if I can get behind signing something that says "I think something should be done" and then not actually doing anything.

I support preserving and promoting theatre.  I support keeping humanities programs alive and vibrant in public schools. I also support working personally to make those things possible.  It's all well and good to trust your government and school board to fix the problem, but when they're the ones who created it in the first place, maybe you should explore other options. 

"All the men and women merely players," is how Shakespeare's quote about the nature of the world ends, and I, for one, want to know I performed my part well.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Snap Judgements! Co-Signing the Health Bill??

So, uh, what do you think of this?

http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/hccosign?source=20100322_FB

Matt Lindeboom
I think it's cheesy as hell. And yes, I did sign up to co-sign health care with President Obama.

Ozkirbas
That's dumber than bumper stickers. And bumper stickers are pretty dumb. Doesn't an idea have to work first before people are supposed to be proud of it? Doesn't the Democratic National Committee realize that getting healthcare reform enacted is just the first step in a long, arduous campaign to make sure it keeps itself and America afloat? Or, to make sure it practically works in a real world sense? Or, to ensure that it's well written so that admin judges don't tear it apart? Really? Good job? Pack it in? A good day was had by all? Seriously? Party, party, party - everybody get wasted?


If you promoted the healthcare reform, by all means be happy. You've come a long way. Your dream has been realized. We, as a people, will get to see this idea come into action. But, SERIOUSLY?

David Pratt
I've read over the amendments proposed and the people they would affect, and by and large this seems like a step in the right direction for the country. It's something Presidents have been bemoaning since Teddy Roosevelt was in office, and Obama finally got the job at least partially done.

However, this bill is bereft of the teeth that would have made it something to honestly be proud of. A President says he wants to work to make health care available to every American and it seriously takes 14 months of haggling, dealing, and debating for something which barely resembles the original proposal to pass? This entire fiasco has exposed a great deal of the weaknesses of our current Congress. I hope Democrats realize it's now incumbent upon them to make sure this legislation actually does what it's supposed to do, and I hope Republicans realize their antics have made it seem more than anything like they just flat-out hate America.

Max Nova
I don't really need to sign this. I vote in primaries and local elections, that's my civic duty right there. Voters should stay informed and vote for the best candidate available and let representatives pass the legislation. Sure, call and write letters, donate to a PAC but for me the important thing is to see my Senator and Rep's names on the legislation. Let's not turn every law into a chain letter.

ali d
I feel like we're on the playground.


"I support it more than you!"
"Nuh-uh! I signed it! It's archived!"
"Well I signed it FIRST."
"You didn't sign it?! Well you can't sit at our lunch table anymore! WHAT WILL THE CHILDREN THINK?!"


My gosh, kids, let's let the damn legislation make it all the way through the system before we start aligning our names with it. Talk to me in 2014.

B.Graham
Why would I sign this? I didn’t get a vote in the bill process, I’ve never read it, and half of the things I wanted in it were cut out, so why would I put my name next to something I had nothing to do with, even if I was rooting for it? Just so my name is near the President's? Okay, that's pretty cool, but I'm going to stand my ground! Because this looks like just another attempt at making our facebook generation feel like we are Important and Do Things for doing nothing and having no voice, which I consider an affront to my intelligence as a twentysomething.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

EMMYS FAIL

In recent news, members of the Writer's Guild of America West (WGAW) are actively protesting changes to the upcoming Emmy Awards broadcast - primarily the choice to remove writer's awards from the live feed. Outraged, a selection of executive producers and showrunners have petitioned the Emmy's producers to return the award show to its previously scheduled program:

http://wga.org/content/default.aspx?id=3702

Writers and television showrunners feel both that the honor of receiving an award would be lessened and that this decision reinforces a hierarchy of importance - putting writers and penmen at the rock bottom. To retort, host Neil Patrick Harris and executive producer Don Mischer spoke to the Los Angeles Times about the proposed changes and what they would entail:


Essentially, Emmy producers want to "trim the fat," as they say. By taping the writer's speeches before hand and editing out all the "hugging" and "aisle walking," they've decided to "accentuate" the more interesting parts of the awards ceremony and save time.

Interesting times, indeed. How would YOU decide, America?

===================================================================

The Ozkirpinion:

It's not the end of the world. The Emmys, in purpose, are a little decadent and self-indulgent and a little bit of editing isn't going to ruin that for anyone. But, then again, isn't part of the Emmys for entertainers to congratulate their colleagues and give them a chance to show themselves to the world?

A lot of attention for TV shows drifts toward the series creators and the actors who play the parts. And, it makes sense - they're the literal faces of their respective programs and they're the metaphorical hooks that keep people coming back week after week. Writers rarely get the opportunity to stand out in the open and say, "Hey! Look at this awesome thing that I do and totally (read: usually) get paid for!" After so much time in the shadows, writing text, and developing the plots that keep people enticed, shouldn't they be allowed to come out into the daylight for just a little bit? True, the current Emmy programming would essentially allow for a degree of celebration discussed above, but why should the writers of programs be treated differently to begin with? "It might enhance viewership" seems to be the veil Emmy producers are hiding behind. Personally, I think it's bullshit. As Jason has noted below and as others have stated elswhere, "TV is a writer's medium." Why the hell should their walks down the aisle or their gratuitous hugging or self-celebration be any less important than anyone else's?

As I've said, it's not the end of the world. But, it doesn't have to be. A travesty is a travesty. And this, fellow Gentlemen, is the epitome of ungentlehood.

PS - Poor form, Neil Patrick Harris! I usually love most of what you do. But, then again, I remember Starship Troopers